Prosecution delivers in its first big fish case

21 March 2016 by Stephanie van den Berg

Judges at the International Criminal Court (ICC) on Monday ruled that Congolese politician Jean-Pierre Bemba's troops raped, murdered and pillaged civilians in the Central African Republic and that he, as their commander, could be held criminally responsible. The ruling is a historic one for the ICC as it is the first time the court has handed down convictions for sexual and crimes and also a first conviction on the basis of command responsibility [IJT-191].

Bemba was convicted for crimes committed by his troops in the Central African Republic (CAR) during 2002 and 2003, when Bemba was asked by then CAR president Ange-Félix Patassé to provide support during a civil war.

The judges ruled that Bemba as the commander of the Movement for the Liberation of Congo (MLC), he knew that crimes were committed or about to be committed by his troops in CAR and he did nothing to stop or punish them.

During the trial Bemba, a former Congolese senator and vice-president, had argued that he had relinquished control over his troops to the CAR authorities at the time the crimes were committed.

But in a devastating judgement for the accused the judges not only found that his troops targeted civilians as they raped, murdered and looted but also that he had complete and effective control over his MLC troops even in CAR. The fact that he took no action to stop crimes or punish them was "deliberately aimed at encouraging attacks", the judges found. A hearing where Bemba's sentence will be determined,  will be set for a later date.

The case is a triumph for the ICC office of the prosecutor who has made prosecution of sexual and gender-based crimes a priority [IJT-179]. In the judgement summary the judges named over 30 rape victims: men, women and girls, one as young as ten years old.

"In this case, the number of rapes committed against civilians exceeded the number of murders. This campaign had horrific consequences and resulted in great victimization. Justice plays an important role. We must continue to strive for the prosecution and accountability of those responsible for such crimes until they are a thing of the past," ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda said in a statement.

Bemba's conviction is also a resounding success for the NGO's like French rights watch-dog FIDH who have worked for many years getting the crimes in CAR prosecuted. Marceau Sivieude, who was part of FIDH's original investigation into CAR crimes, says this first ever verdict that deals with the 2002/2003 crimes will have an impact in the country.

“After 14 years this is only the first judgement by an independent body on the crimes on the largely forgotten 2002/2003 conflict,” he told IJT.

“I hope the echo will give a boost to the establishment of of a special criminal court at the national level,” he said.

In CAR this verdict will mean a lot Sivieude said especially for the hundreds and hundreds of victims. “There was never any justice done on the national level and Bemba was not some mid-level commander. He was very well known by the inhabitants of CAR and feared,” he said.

In the summary of the judgement the judges repeatedly referred to FIDH reports which had been sent to Bemba at the time of the conflict and his responses to the rights watchdog as proof that he was well aware that his troops were committing crimes and chose not to act.




Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo in the ICC courtroom during the delivery of his verdict on 21 March 2016 (Photo: Flickr/ICC-CPI)

Related articles

19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.