Withdrawal of Kenyatta case highlights ICC prosecution weakness

17 December 2014 by Stephanie van den Berg and Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

The withdrawal of charges against Kenya’s President Uhuru Kenyatta two weeks ago has raised questions about the capacity of the International Criminal Court (ICC)’s Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) to secure evidence against suspects if states are unwilling to cooperate.

Image caption: 
Kenya's President Uhuru Kenyatta at the ICC for a status conference in October 2014 (Flickr/ICC-CPI)

On 5 December, in the ICC’s most high-profile case yet, prosecutor Fatou Bensouda announced she was dropping the charges against Kenyatta. The first sitting head of state to appear before the ICC had been charged with crimes against humanity for his alleged role in the 2007-2008 post-election violence that swept the East African country, leaving over a thousand people dead and many more displaced.

The prosecutor’s decision came after the trial chamber refused her request for an adjournment in order to secure more evidence. The need arose as a number of key witnesses had withdrawn or recanted their evidence and the Kenyan government did not hand over solicited documents, such as financial and phone records.

While judges chided Nairobi for not complying with its duties to the court, they decided against a formal finding of non-cooperation, which would trigger a referral of the matter to the ICC’s Assembly of States Parties. The prosecution has since filed for leave to appeal that ruling. 

Want to read more?

We have tailor-made memberships for students, individuals, groups of professionals and large companies and organizations. A subscription entitles you to receive the International Justice Tribune every two weeks as well as become a member of the Justice Tribune Foundation, supporting independent reporting on international justice.

Subscribe now

Related articles

issue
17 December 2014

Links to articles and PDF of IJT 172.

issue
08 October 2014

Links to articles and PDF of IJT issue 167.

article
10 September 2014 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

For the second time, ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda has conceded that she does not have enough evidence to put Kenyan president Uhuru Kenyatta on trial for his alleged role in post-election violence in Kenya in 2007-2008. 

article
17 December 2014 by Thierry Ogier, São Paulo (Brazil)

As international human rights organizations praised the 10 December report of Brazil’s truth commission on military regime-era torture, victims and surviving families expressed indignation. The official report on human rights violations from 1946 to 1988 came after a 30-month investigation led by the National Truth Commission, locally called the CNV [IJT-170]. 

article
02 February 2011 by Linawati Sidarto

Radio journalist Joshua Arap Sang was the only non-politician among the six Kenyans named by the International Criminal Court in December as the alleged masterminds of the country’s post-election violence. Experts, however, warn against comparisons between Kenya’s Kass FM and Rwanda’s notorious RTLM.