Lubanga appeals ruling requestions ICC fairness

03 December 2014 by Benjamin Duerr, The Hague (The Netherlands)

This week the International Criminal Court (ICC), on appeal, upheld its first-ever verdict. However, the decision once again raises questions about the work of the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) and the accused’s right to a fair trial.

Thomas Lubanga at his appeals verdict (Flickr/ICC-CPI)
Image caption: 
Thomas Lubanga at his appeals verdict (Flickr/ICC-CPI)

Judge Anita Usacka’s words were clear: “I would have reversed the conviction.” On Monday, the Latvian magistrate delivered a strong dissenting opinion after the appeals chamber confirmed Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga’s guilt and 14-year sentence. With that final judgment rendered, the ICC closed the Lubanga file. It was the very first verdict of the court in The Hague [IJT blog].

Lubanga had led the Union des Patriotes Congolais (UPC) militia in the Democratic Republic of Congo’s troubled Ituri province. In 2012, he was convicted of war crimes, consisting of enlisting and conscripting child soldiers. Lubanga appealed, arguing that, among other things, the charges were insufficiently detailed and the trial was unfair since the prosecution did not investigate carefully enough.

In their appeals judgment, a majority of judges rejected those allegations. They also said they would not reassess the evidence and would have intervened only if the lower trial chamber assessment was unreasonable.

“The Lubanga disaster”

Want to read more?

We have tailor-made memberships for students, individuals, groups of professionals and large companies and organizations. A subscription entitles you to receive the International Justice Tribune every two weeks as well as become a member of the Justice Tribune Foundation, supporting independent reporting on international justice.

Subscribe now

Related articles

28 May 2014 by Tjitske Lingsma, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over two days, Thomas Lubanga Dyilo’s defence challenged key video footage supporting the verdict that convicted the Congolese militia leader in 2012 for using child soldiers. During an appeals hearing held last week at the International Criminal Court (ICC), two witnesses explained that although they might have looked like child soldiers, they were young adults.

03 December 2014

 Links to articles and PDF of IJT issue number 171.

14 March 2012

Summary and link to PDF of IJT 147.

15 April 2014 by IJT

The International Criminal Court (ICC) judges decided last week to postpone, sine die, the appeals hearings of Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, convicted two years ago to 14 years imprisonment. 

ICC's office of public counsel for victims at the Lubanga appeals hearing on 3 March 2015 (Photo: Flickr/ICC-CPI)
10 March 2015 by Stephanie van den Berg, The Hague (The Netherlands)

In a landmark appeals ruling last week, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued guidelines on reparations to victims in the Lubanga case that are expected to lead the court in future cases.