Lebanon: new hybrid tribunal in the works

24 July 2006 by Jerome Mayer-Cantu

At a time when Lebanon is being plunged into crisis, the UN International Independent Investigation Commission which is laying the groundwork for a new hybrid tribunal to try the perpetrators of the bombing attack that killed Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri on February 14, 2005, has made decisive progress. The statute of the court, its legal system, location and other logistical questions have nearly been finalized, according to Lebanese legal sources.

In July, two Lebanese judges visited the UN's New York headquarters for a meeting to work out the final details of witness protection, transportation, and future funding for the tribunal. These discussions officially began in January 2006 when Nicholas Michel, the United Nations Undersecretary for Legal Affairs visited Lebanon to begin discussions with officials concerning the establishment of a tribunal with an "international character" - a hybrid court similar to those established in Sierra Leone and East Timor. In February, two Lebanese judges, Ralph Riachi and Choukri Sader, visited New York for three days in order to meet with Michel and discuss several distinct proposals for the court. These same judges returned for a second meeting in June to determine the court's ultimate shape, and are now finalizing their decisions.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.