ICC Victims Trust Fund still in limbo


Nearly four years after it was established, with its board of directors up for re-election at the end of 2006, the Victims Trust Fund, and autonomous body of the International Criminal Court (ICC) is still not up and running. In December 2005, the ICC's Assembly of States Parties (ASP) finally adopted the Fund's bylaws and decided to equip it with a secretariat, making it possible for the Fund to begin operating - at least in theory.

Simone Veil, Chair of the Victims Trust Fund board calls the Fund "one of the most innovative features of the ICC." NGOs and human rights activists have passionately supported this institution, fearing that because of the harsh realities of the court, assistance for the many victims would be too little too late. Thus, the Victims Trust Fund aims to provide compensation to a greater number of victims than the number of those who testify in trials. It can also provide assistance more quickly without getting bogged down in criminal procedures, through individual, collective, material or symbolic compensation. At the 2004 ASP, Veil stressed the need to equip the Fund with a streamlined executive structure. Neither Veil nor the four other prestigious members of the Board of Directors will be in charge of running the Fund. In the end, the ASP agreed in December 2005 to set aside money in the 2006 budget to establish a secretariat for the Fund.

Only a " liaison officer "

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.