Swiss banks' pay bitterly for dark past

05 March 2007 by Pierre Hazan

On August 12, 1998, the Union of Swiss Banks and Crédit Suisse agreed to pay 1.25 billion USD to American Jewish organizations bringing to a close one of the most serious political crises that Switzerland has known since WWII. Nine years later, what assessment can be made of a controversy that aroused passions, provoked a political identity crisis in the heart of Swiss society, strained US-Swiss relations and forced Swiss banks to lift bank confidentiality for the years of 1939-1945?

The root of the issue is simple: a number of Jews murdered by the Nazis had bank accounts in Switzerland. After 1945, the Swiss banks made no effort - and sometimes even blocked efforts - to return this money to the rightful account holders. But with the end of the Cold War, Switzerland lost its strategic importance for the US. American Jewish organizations increased their pressure on Swiss banks, threatening to boycott them, while victims filed a class action lawsuit. Threatened with doors being closed to the vital American market, the Swiss banks signed the general accord before the American judge Edward Korman. The sum was negotiated bitterly and secretly. To this day there are two opposing theories. For the Swiss banks, this sum is largely overvalued, having nothing to do with the reality of the funds in escheat. They say, basically, they are paying for having lost the battle with the Jewish organizations. The latter, on the contrary, assert that these banks destroyed the records of more than 2.5 million accounts opened between 1939 and 1945 (out of a total of 6.8 million) and thus concealed the disappearance of the assets.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

21 December 2011 by Thijs Bouwknegt

Being the ICC's Chief Prosecutor is a delicate and politically sensitivejob.ForLuisMorenoOcampo it has been "the best job in the world." Fatou Bensouda will be taking over his office in June. She inhe

07 December 2011 by Thijs Bouwknegt

December 7, 2011 Ivory Coast is the latest playgroundoftheInternationalCriminal Court. This week the courtroom in The Hague became its theatre of justice. Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo proudly p

07 December 2011 by Richard Walker

Four Congolese witnesses testifying at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, find themselves caught in a legal wrangle, which could at once set a legal precedent and make them the last

07 December 2011 by Lindy Janssen

Brazil is booming. The economy is expanding and the country is getting ready to host the Football World Cup in 2014 and the Olympics in 2016. But the Latin American giant has not even begun dealing wi

07 December 2011 by Radosa Milutinovic

The primary purpose of the retrial of Ramush Haradinaj, as proclaimed by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in its appeal judgement in July, should have been to hear testimonies of two "key" witnesses who proved unwilling to testify in the original trial in 2007. Almost four months into the retrial which started in mid-August, its stated aim has not yet been achieved.