ICC finally convicts Lubanga – in silence

01 December 2014 by Benjamin Duerr, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Two years ago, the International Criminal Court (ICC) delivered its first-ever judgment in the case against Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga. On Monday, the court closed the case, with an appeals chamber confirming Lubanga's conviction. But in stark contrast to March 2012, only a few journalists and trial monitors were there to see it live.

The appeals chamber rejected each of Lubanga's grounds of appeal and confirmed both the verdict and the 14-year sentence handed down by the lower trial chamber.

When Lubanga was first sentenced, the world was watching closely and hopefully. He was the very first person convicted by the ICC. The judgment was hailed as a breakthrough for global justice and a milestone in international law. Lawyers, human rights activists and journalists flocked to The Hague to see history in the making.

On Monday afternoon, however, only half the seats in the public gallery were occupied. The ICC media centre remained relatively calm. Outside the court building, no protesters demanded to “free Lubanga”, a practice often seen during other ICC trials.

“It seems as if the world has forgotten about Thomas Lubanga,” noted Thijs Bouwknegt from the Center for War and Genocide Studies (NIOD) in Amsterdam, who has followed the proceedings since Lubanga was transferred from DRC to The Hague.

Lubanga was the leader of the Union of Congolese Patriots (UPC) and its military wing. The ICC had found him guilty of war crimes consisting of the enlistment and conscription of child soldiers younger than 15. As UPC president and commander-in-chief, Lubanga influenced and directed the policies, the court found. He was regularly updated on implementation of the common plan. He provided “significant logistical support”. He personally used children under 15 as his bodyguards, charged the judges.

After having convicted Lubanga, the trial chamber, in a separate hearing, sentenced him to 14 years imprisonment. The judges had treated each charge separately: 13 years for conscripting child soldiers, 12 years for enlisting, 15 years for using them actively in hostilities. As a joint sentence, 14 years was deemed appropriate. The years Lubanga had so far spent in detention in The Hague were deducted; the period of time he was imprisoned in Congo, however, was not. 

On Monday, four of the five appeals judges confirmed Lubanga's conviction and the sentencing. The dissenting judge, Anita Usacka, argued that the evidence was not sufficient to establish his guilt "beyond reasonable doubt". 

With every ground of appeal that the judges dismissed, his lawyers seemed to grow more jaded. They rarely took notes anymore, their heads resting on their hands. Wearing an ornate blue-tinted dashiki, Lubanga looked on stoically.

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.