First-ever ICTR trial transfer could be recalled from Rwanda

02 June 2015 by Clive Muhenga, Arusha (Tanzania)

The UN Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals (MICT) has for the first time said that a genocide case handed over to the Rwandan judiciary by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) may have to be returned, due to fair trial concerns. If taken, the decision would be a serious setback for the Arusha court’s exit strategy.
 

Rwandan genocide court artwork by Surian Soosay (Photo: Flickr/ssoosay)
Image caption: 
Rwandan genocide court artwork by Surian Soosay (Photo: Flickr/ssoosay)

Jean Uwinkindi’s transfer to Rwanda was the first to be approved by the ICTR. Long under pressure from the UN to finalize all cases, the court heard its last appeals case in April [IJT-180], and has been expected to finally close its doors when that judgment is announced. Its residual functions, including monitoring transferred cases, have been absorbed by the MICT, which operates with a fraction of its predecessors’ UN-level staffing.

The ICTR transferred Uwinkindi’s case to Kigali on 19 April 2012, following a long legal battle by lawyers of the Pentecostal pastor. Previously, the ICTR had rejected all transfer requests by the prosecutor, arguing that Rwanda lacked conditions for fair trials. But after Kigali implemented a series of reforms, the court finally agreed.

Yet some observers remain unconvinced. Carina Tertsakian, a researcher on Rwanda for Human Rights Watch, tells IJT that despite important legal and administrative reforms, “we believe that the Rwandan justice system still lacks sufficient guarantees of independence, and that fair trials cannot be guaranteed in all cases”.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.