Sudan braces for referendum

15 December 2010 by Koert Lindijer

Justice has always been a rare commodity in Sudan, and the imminent divorce between North and South Sudan will not necessarily lead to democracy and more human rights. Southern Sudan will be a fragile state and the North will probably become more autocratic. Meanwhile, the war in Darfur may even reignite. 

The Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) signed in 2001 by the Sudanese People’s Liberation Army and the government in Khartoum had two major components: democratisation in the whole of Sudan and a referendum in the South about its future status. When the last hurdles are smoothed out, the referendum will take place in January and the Southern Sudanese most likely will vote for independence.

In light of the upcoming separation, the Darfur rebels are re-positioning themselves. Denied access to neighboring Chad since a peace deal earlier this year between Khartoum and N’Djamena, the rebels are reportedly moving into areas of South Sudan. In a development that may give an indication of things to come once South Sudan is independent, the Northern army is bombarding these Darfuri insurgents in the South.

The relations between the then insurgents of the Sudanese People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) in the South and their rebel colleagues in Darfur were frosty for years. But in the last three years their contact has significantly improved. The SPLA and several rebel movements in Darfur face, for now, a common adversary in Khartoum.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.