Prosecution of Guatemala’s human rights violators faces uncertain future

10 March 2015 by Louisa Reynolds, Guatemala City (Guatemala)

The road to justice for the victims of human rights violations committed during Guatemala’s 36-year civil war has been long and fraught with obstacles. Prosecuting wartime violators has proven slow. And with the September elections looming and the UN-sponsored International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG) about to conclude its mandate, the outcome of current and future trials grows increasingly uncertain.

Former dictator Efraín Ríos Montt on trial for genocide in May 2013 in Guatemala City (Photo: Flickr/coolloud)
Image caption: 
Former dictator Efraín Ríos Montt on trial for genocide in May 2013 in Guatemala City (Photo: Flickr/coolloud)

Recent successes do include convicting former high-ranking police official Pedro García Arredondo for his role in a 1980 embassy assault that left 37 people dead and, more recently, the Constitutional Court clearing obstacles for the prosecution of former dictator Efraín Ríos Montt for the Dos Erres massacre. However, Ríos Montt’s retrial in another criminal prosecution for the genocide perpetrated against the Mayan Ixil people remains stalled and deteriorating health makes his participation unlikely.

On 19 January, García Arredondo was sentenced to 90 years in prison. A court determined that he was key among the military and police officers who ordered a brutal attack on Spanish embassy occupiers desperate to draw attention to the massacres perpetrated by the army in the highlands. Indigenous leaders, student protestors and embassy staff were burnt alive after officers attacked them with a flamethrower and prevented firemen from rescuing them.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.