The ICTY, Seselj and provisional release

09 July 2014 by IJT

Vojislav Seselj voluntarily surrendered to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), in February 2003, to answer accusations of war crimes and crimes against humanity for his role during the expulsion of non-Serbs from parts of Croatia and Bosnia between 1991 and 1993. Eleven and a half years on, the leader of the Serb Radical Party (SRS) remains in the custody.

His trial ended in March 2012, but the verdict is not expected soon and the court, concerned about the accused’s health, recently deemed it “appropriate to obtain the view of the parties on possible provisional release of the accused”. The ICTY has asked Seselj to declare in writing that he will comply with the conditions of his possible provisional release. The tribunal wants him to be placed under supervision of the Serbian authorities, under house arrest. In a response to the court, Seselj said, on 17 June, he had no intention to comply with the terms and that he would take part in the political life, appear in public and criticize the tribunal in The Hague.

Tags: 

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.