Srebrenica Mothers - abandoned

06 June 2011 by Selma Leydesdorff

In 2007 lawyers for the survivors of the 1995 genocide in Srebrenica took their case  to the District Court in the Hague.  It had been expected that the survivors would take legal action against the Netherlands, after the presentation of the NIOD report in 2002, which angered members of the association Mothers of Srebrenica.  The public inquiry in 2002 concluded that the Dutch government held political responsibility for the Srebrenica massacre and blamed the UN for failing to protect the Muslim civilians.

They had come by bus to the Netherlands to listen to how the Dutch officially reported on the failure to protect the town that had been declared a UN ‘safe haven’ during the Bosnian war. Since then, they have been fighting for the world’s attention. The Mothers claim they were abandoned, not only at the time of the genocide but also in the years after.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

21 December 2011 by Thijs Bouwknegt

Being the ICC's Chief Prosecutor is a delicate and politically sensitivejob.ForLuisMorenoOcampo it has been "the best job in the world." Fatou Bensouda will be taking over his office in June. She inhe

07 December 2011 by Thijs Bouwknegt

December 7, 2011 Ivory Coast is the latest playgroundoftheInternationalCriminal Court. This week the courtroom in The Hague became its theatre of justice. Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo proudly p

07 December 2011 by Richard Walker

Four Congolese witnesses testifying at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, find themselves caught in a legal wrangle, which could at once set a legal precedent and make them the last

07 December 2011 by Lindy Janssen

Brazil is booming. The economy is expanding and the country is getting ready to host the Football World Cup in 2014 and the Olympics in 2016. But the Latin American giant has not even begun dealing wi

07 December 2011 by Radosa Milutinovic

The primary purpose of the retrial of Ramush Haradinaj, as proclaimed by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in its appeal judgement in July, should have been to hear testimonies of two "key" witnesses who proved unwilling to testify in the original trial in 2007. Almost four months into the retrial which started in mid-August, its stated aim has not yet been achieved.