ICC finally convicts Lubanga – in silence

01 December 2014 by Benjamin Duerr, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Two years ago, the International Criminal Court (ICC) delivered its first-ever judgment in the case against Congolese warlord Thomas Lubanga. On Monday, the court closed the case, with an appeals chamber confirming Lubanga's conviction. But in stark contrast to March 2012, only a few journalists and trial monitors were there to see it live.

The appeals chamber rejected each of Lubanga's grounds of appeal and confirmed both the verdict and the 14-year sentence handed down by the lower trial chamber.

When Lubanga was first sentenced, the world was watching closely and hopefully. He was the very first person convicted by the ICC. The judgment was hailed as a breakthrough for global justice and a milestone in international law. Lawyers, human rights activists and journalists flocked to The Hague to see history in the making.

On Monday afternoon, however, only half the seats in the public gallery were occupied. The ICC media centre remained relatively calm. Outside the court building, no protesters demanded to “free Lubanga”, a practice often seen during other ICC trials.

“It seems as if the world has forgotten about Thomas Lubanga,” noted Thijs Bouwknegt from the Center for War and Genocide Studies (NIOD) in Amsterdam, who has followed the proceedings since Lubanga was transferred from DRC to The Hague.

Lubanga was the leader of the Union of Congolese Patriots (UPC) and its military wing. The ICC had found him guilty of war crimes consisting of the enlistment and conscription of child soldiers younger than 15. As UPC president and commander-in-chief, Lubanga influenced and directed the policies, the court found. He was regularly updated on implementation of the common plan. He provided “significant logistical support”. He personally used children under 15 as his bodyguards, charged the judges.

After having convicted Lubanga, the trial chamber, in a separate hearing, sentenced him to 14 years imprisonment. The judges had treated each charge separately: 13 years for conscripting child soldiers, 12 years for enlisting, 15 years for using them actively in hostilities. As a joint sentence, 14 years was deemed appropriate. The years Lubanga had so far spent in detention in The Hague were deducted; the period of time he was imprisoned in Congo, however, was not. 

On Monday, four of the five appeals judges confirmed Lubanga's conviction and the sentencing. The dissenting judge, Anita Usacka, argued that the evidence was not sufficient to establish his guilt "beyond reasonable doubt". 

With every ground of appeal that the judges dismissed, his lawyers seemed to grow more jaded. They rarely took notes anymore, their heads resting on their hands. Wearing an ornate blue-tinted dashiki, Lubanga looked on stoically.

Related articles

article
21 December 2011 by Thijs Bouwknegt

Being the ICC's Chief Prosecutor is a delicate and politically sensitivejob.ForLuisMorenoOcampo it has been "the best job in the world." Fatou Bensouda will be taking over his office in June. She inhe

article
07 December 2011 by Thijs Bouwknegt

December 7, 2011 Ivory Coast is the latest playgroundoftheInternationalCriminal Court. This week the courtroom in The Hague became its theatre of justice. Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo proudly p

article
07 December 2011 by Richard Walker

Four Congolese witnesses testifying at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, find themselves caught in a legal wrangle, which could at once set a legal precedent and make them the last

article
07 December 2011 by Lindy Janssen

Brazil is booming. The economy is expanding and the country is getting ready to host the Football World Cup in 2014 and the Olympics in 2016. But the Latin American giant has not even begun dealing wi

article
07 December 2011 by Radosa Milutinovic

The primary purpose of the retrial of Ramush Haradinaj, as proclaimed by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in its appeal judgement in July, should have been to hear testimonies of two "key" witnesses who proved unwilling to testify in the original trial in 2007. Almost four months into the retrial which started in mid-August, its stated aim has not yet been achieved.