Will the ICC look again at Mavi Marmara?

10 February 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Last week, the Comoros broke new legal ground at the International Criminal Court (ICC). Lawyers representing the African island nation challenged the prosecutor's decision to reject the demand to open an official investigation into the events surrounding Israel’s raid on a flotilla of activists attempting to run a naval blockade off the Gaza Strip in 2010.

The Comoros-flagged Mavi Marmara (Photo: Flickr/yasinonat)
Image caption: 
The Comoros-flagged Mavi Marmara (Photo: Flickr/yasinonat)

In November 2014, after an 18-month-long preliminary examination of the events, prosecutor Fatou Bensouda had rejected the original referral, which was initiated by the Comoros, a flag-owner of one of the ships. Her rejection was on grounds of gravity.

During the incident, when Israel Defense Forces boarded the vessels, which included the Comoros-flagged Mavi Marmara, nine activists were killed, one died later and several other activists and Israel soldiers were injured.

Lawyers for the Comoros argue that the situation is so important it deserves an oral hearing before the court. They also claim the situation has changed because, in the meantime, Palestine joined the ICC. This incident and the surrounding circumstances concerning the economic blockade of the Gaza Strip could therefore be seen as part of a future wider case, they say.

The request raises new legal issues for the court: the Rome Statute allows the prosecutor to revisit decisions. But this is the first time a state has requested such a review. The lawyers specifically criticized the length of time it had taken for the prosecutor to make her preliminary report.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.