Utter contempt of court at the ICTY

05 October 2011 by Radosa Milutinovic

It was two years ago that judge Patrick Robinson, President of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), warned in a speech to the UN Security Council that contempt proceedings had a “negative impact on the expeditious progress of trials”.

Contempt proceedings, Judge Robinson said, were “sapping the strength of the Tribunal and diverting us from our main objective: the fair and expeditious completion of our trials and appeals”.

As an example, the Tribunal's president cited the peculiar case of Vojislav Seselj – a Serbian politician charged with grave crimes against Croats and Muslims during the wars in the former Yugoslavia. His trial has been adjourned for months in order to investigate possible contempt offences.

In June 2009, when president Robinson spoke to the Security Council, Seselj had already been charged with contempt of court for revealing the identities of protected witnesses in one of his numerous books in which he regularly offends and abuses the Tribunal's judges and prosecutors.

Fast forward to autumn 2011 - and Seselj's contempt of court score card reads: sentenced to 15 months imprisonment; awaiting a second sentencing judgement; facing yet another trial and probably, new charges.

And that was after the Tribunal amended its rules to “deal expeditiously with contempt cases without delaying war crimes trials”.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.