Transitional justice unlocked in Nepal

30 April 2014 by Dewan Rai, Kathmandu (Nepal)

Nepal’s parliament finally passed a bill on Friday, 25 April, seven years after it was due, that sets in motion the formation of two separate commissions – on Truth and Reconciliation (TRC) and on Investigation of Missing Persons. At the signing of the peace agreement that had ended, in 2006, a decade-long armed Maoist insurgency in the country that claimed nearly 16,000 lives and 1,300 missing persons, a TRC was envisaged within six months.

The bill has undergone major amendments, sought by the main political parties. They proposed the creation of a special court, that will deal with conflict related cases forwarded to the government attorney by the TRC, which received a mandate “to make reconciliation between the perpetrator and victim, to recommend reparations for victims and to recommend for legal action against those involved in serious crimes.”

“The passage of this bill, which came about after a lot of debate and preparation, is an important milestone in Nepal’s peace process,” says Ram Narayan Bidari, leader of major opposition party Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). The full package of post-conflict measures has included the integration of then rebel Maoist’s army – People’s Liberation Army – into the national army, and the drafting of a new constitution. “The bill has given a much needed impetus to the delayed peace process”, says Bidari. 

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.