STL puts a fifth element on trial – as disillusion prevails in Lebanon

11 June 2014 by Lynn Maalouf, Beirut (Lebanon)

The Hague-based Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) will re-open its trial next week for a few days, with a new element: Hassan Habib Merhi. He is the fifth in absentia suspect in one of the most dramatic political assassinations to take place in the region, which killed 22 people including Lebanon’s Prime Minister Rafik Hariri . But to those in Lebanon who have been eyeing with growing wariness the long-awaited start of the trials, this late indictment has been received with some frustration.

The STL decision to join Merhi to the first four indictees came one month after the long-awaited trial proceedings kicked off on 16 January, causing further delays in order to allow his defence to prepare their case. “If every time a new suspect is added, we have to wait seven to eight months, the delay could be a violation of the speedy delivery of justice,” complained one member of the audience at a Beirut Bar Association meeting held in March, during a joint presentation by the head of the defence office and first-time public appearance in Lebanon of prosecutor Norman Farrell, who immediately quipped back, “characterizing this as a delay implies that the answer is already out there.” 

The “missing link”

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.