The rape trial of Colonel 106 - a test for Congo’s military justice

10 September 2014 by Louise Jones, Kinshasa (DRC)

Last month a small courtroom perched on a green hill in South Kivu province began hosting a trial many see as a crucial test for the Democratic Republic of Congo’s judiciary. In the dock before a three-judge panel military court is Colonel Bedi Mobuli Engangela, an army officer once one of the most feared men in eastern Congo.

Engangela’s trial is viewed as an opportunity to show if the DRC’s military justice is willing to convict high-ranking officers in cases of sexual violence. The officer, who is also known as Colonel 106, is accused of crimes against humanity in having ordered and/or committed rape, murder and looting between 2005 and 2006 in the east of the country. He denies all the charges.

“It is a very symbolic case,” said Scott Campbell of the UN’s mission in Congo, MONUSCO. “[Engangela] has committed many of the most serious crimes that we see all too often in DR Congo.” MONUSCO helped put the case against Colonel 106 together and sees it, according to Campbell, “as a bit of a test case” to determine if the military can deliver justice for “very serious crimes committed by a senior officer within the Congolese army”.

The trial started on 11 August in the tiny village of Kalehe. In its first week, the four benches in the modest-sized space were packed with spectators. Engangela, clad in uniform and surrounded by his defence lawyers, looked relaxed and self-assured.

Victims speak

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.