Ongwen transfer raises doubts over Uganda's ability to hold war crimes trials

21 February 2015 by Samuel Egadu Okiror, Kampala (Uganda)

Uganda's decision to support the transfer of Dominic Ongwen [IJT-174] to the International Criminal Court (ICC), instead of trying the notorious Lord's Resistance Army commander at home, casts a shadow on the county's ability to hold domestic war crimes trials.

LRA child memorial (Photo: Flickr/Josh Zakary)
Image caption: 
LRA child memorial (Photo: Flickr/Josh Zakary)

After Ongwen’s capture, many Ugandans hoped the former protégé of LRA warlord Joseph Kony would be domestically prosecuted before the specially set up International Crimes Division (ICD) [IJT-164].

The country had the ability to try Ongwen, but chose not to “because of the nature of crimes he committed,” Peter Nyombi, Uganda’s attorney general, told IJT. The atrocities extended beyond Uganda, into the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), South Sudan and the Central African Republic (CAR), he explained. Plus, Uganda had already referred the LRA situation to The Hague, so “we decided ICC was the best for the prosecution of Ongwen,” Nyombi said.

The ICD was established in 2008 to hold national trials for serious offences like war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. It was part of efforts to implement the ultimately rejected Juba peace agreement reached that same year between the government and the LRA. 

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.