The Netherlands difficulties to try the Rwandan genocide

19 November 2007 by HEIKELINA VERRIJN STUART

On December 3, the district court of The Hague will hear, on appeal, the request of trial for genocide in the Netherlands of Rwandan Joseph Mpambara, which is supported by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) but at the request of a Dutch prosecutor. In the first instance, the court at The Hague decided, on July 24, that was no basis in national law for a genocide prosecution. The case is a sensitive one for the ICTR, which is working to transfer its cases to national jurisdictions besides Rwanda as part of its completion strategy.

Before his arrest in August 2006, Mpambara was living in the Netherlands as a refugee. Mpambara is the brother of Obed Ruzindana, an important merchant sentenced by the ICTR to 25 years in prison for genocide and crimes against humanity in 1999. Mpambara was on file with the justice department as a possible genocide suspect, but the ICTR never showed any interest in him. The initiative came from the Dutch general prosecutor, who went to Arusha to ask his ICTR counterpart to allow the Netherlands to prosecute Mpambara. The Dutch prosecutor stressed that the UN tribunal had primary jurisdiction and that he consequently could not prosecute Mpambara without its backing. Not having indicted Mpambara, the ICTR prosecutor accepted to pass this unusual request on to the Netherlands.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.