The Mother Theresa of Kigali

05 February 2007 by Franck Petit

"That was a strange kind of trial," whispered a disappointed Rwandan woman who, along with many relatives and supporters of the widow of Rwanda's ex-president, had come to watch her defend herself before the Refugee Appeals Board. It took six long hours of hearings on January 25 for this administrative jurisdiction to decide whether there were "serious reasons to believe" that Agathe Habyarimana had any responsibility in the 1994 genocide.

Based on this suspicion, OFPRA [Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons] denied her asylum application on January 4. Her lawyers appealed. It is now up to the appeals board to determine whether or not "Mrs. Agathe", who was evacuated from Kigali by the French authorities after the genocide began and has been living in France for the past ten years as a wealthy "undocumented" immigrant, will be granted political refugee status and be able stay in France with her children, who obtained the status. "Our jurisdiction will make its decision freely," assured Henri Desclaux, the session's presiding judge. "There are no special cases and if there were, that would be all the more reason to treat it as ordinary."

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.