Haradinaj, the end of a trial of exceptions


With Kosovo on the brink of declaring its independence from Serbia, the case against its resistance hero former Prime Minister Ramush Haradinaj came to an end on January 23 before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY).

Everything about the Haradinaj trial was exceptional, including the announcement by the defense last December that they would not present a case. For the lawyers of Haradinaj and his co-accused Idriz Balaj and Lahi Brahimaj, there was simply nothing more to say. In their view, their crossexamination of prosecution witnesses had done enough damage to either cast doubt on their credibility or dismantle the facts they had testified about.

This was the second trial before the ICTY involving former members of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), the resistance army against the Serb dominance in Kosovo in 1998-1999. According to the prosecution, Haradinaj, born in 1968, was the overall commander and the most powerful individual in the Dukagjini Zone. Balaj, 26 at the time, commanded a special unit, the Black Eagles, while Brahimaj, 28 at the time, was a senior KLA figure in the Dukagjini Zone. This close relative to Haradinaj was more specifically in charge of the Jabllanicë district in the town of Dakovica, in particular the detention centre where prisoners were allegedly tortured and murdered.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.