Hadzic stars in last act at Yugoslav tribunal

24 September 2014 by Sandra Milic, The Hague (The Netherlands)

For more than a month, former Croatian Serb leader Goran Hadzic has tried to convince judges of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia that he had no actual clout during the war in Croatia and his fiery media appearances during the 1991-1995 conflict were just for show. The last ICTY fugitive to be caught in 2011, Hadzic was prime minister of the Serbian Autonomous Region of Eastern Slavonia and later president of the Republic of the Serbian Krajina.

ICTY 'Wanted' posters from 2000 and 2011 after Hadzic's arrest
Image caption: 
ICTY 'Wanted' posters from 2000 and 2011 after Hadzic's arrest (Flickr/ICTY)

On 3 July, he took the stand in his own defence against charges that he was responsible for persecutions, torture and murder of non-Serbs in the Serb-held Krajina region in Croatia from 1991 to 1993. The defence endeavoured to persuade judges that Hadzic did not participate in a joint criminal enterprise aiming to forcibly and permanently remove non-Serbs from large parts of Croatia. His lawyers tried to shift the blame for the crimes onto the Serb-controlled Yugoslav People’s Army (JNA). According to the defence, the army had the de facto power over the units on the ground, including paramilitaries led by Vojislav Seselj.

“I just exaggerated things” 

Hadzic was the first witness to take the stand. He tried to cast himself as a powerless simple warehouse employee who accidentally rose to political power. This image of impotence is a change from the man seen in footage of the dozens of interviews he gave during the war, whose goal, prosecutors said, was to “incite and fan the flames of violence and retribution”. 

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.