Genocide: Danish electric shock

20 July 2011 by Franck Petit

The first ever genocide case brought before a Danish court has produced the effect of an electric shock. The Roskilde county court (30 kilometres west of Copenhagen) found that “there is no legal basis in Denmark to prosecute foreigners charged with genocide in another country”, in a controversial decision published on Tuesday 31 May. 

In this landmark case, Emmanuel Mbarushimana, a Rwandan citizen aged 49, is suspected of taking part in the 1994 genocide when he was a primary school inspector in the town of Muganza, south of Rwanda. The investigation into allegations that Mbarushimana committed genocide is still ongoing and an indictment has yet to be issued.

Mbarushimana has been living in Denmark since 2001. He was granted asylum, under the patronym Kunda, when he was arrested last December in Roskilde, where he was living. In particular, he is suspected of planning killings during meetings with Elie Ndayambaje, former mayor of Muganza, who is awaiting judgement at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, in the Butare Prefecture group trial.

Mbarushimana’s defence counsel, a prominent lawyer and politician in Denmark, makes no secret of the fact he wanted to create a salutary schock in Denmark by asking the Roskilde court to drop the genocide charges against his client.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.