Gaddafi et al. – local or international justice?

20 October 2011 by Geraldine Coughlan

The death of former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has sparked speculation about what this means for international justice. Obviously, the arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for crimes against humanity in June, will die with him.

But his son Saif al-Islam and spymaster Abdullah al-Senussi are still being sought by the ICC in The Hague, for murder and persecution allegedly committed across Libya in February, through the state apparatus and security forces.

There have been calls to put Gaddafi et al. on trial in Libya, by the rebel National Transitional Council, echoed by France and Britain. Saif al-Islam and Abdullah al-Senussi, if captured – or if they surrender – will face trial at the ICC, which was authorised to investigate the situation in Libya, by the UN Security Council.

As a result, the ICC – the world’s criminal court – has first say. So, the two must face trial in The Hague, not in Tripoli.

Cairo - why not Tripoli?
With Egypt's Hosni Mubarak on trial in Cairo, many are asking whether the National Transitional Council (NTC) could put other members of Gaddafi’s former regime on trial in Tripoli.

Libya has not signed up as a member of the ICC and as the court does not have its own police force, there’s no one available to go and arrest the ‘wanted men’ - Saif al-Islam and Abdullah al-Senussi.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.