Butare, a trial out of bounds at the ICTR

04 June 2007 by Thierry Cruvellier

On June 11, it will be six years since the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) began the trial for six genocide suspects who come from the Butare region in southern Rwanda. The six Rwandans, whose positions and background were quite different, were joined together to "speed up the proceedings." However, this produced just the opposite effect, and the trial has been dragged out with irreparable consequences. This month, two of the accused will begin their thirteenth year in prison with still no verdict in sight. In July, three others will be celebrating their tenth year in prison. So much for international human rights law, which guarantees a defendant the right to be tried "without undue delay." This affair has done much to tarnish a tribunal that was supposed to uphold human rights. The prosecution has taken three and a half years to present 59 witnesses. In two and a half years, four defense teams will have called approximately 80. At this rate, it will take another two years to hear the 60 remaining witnesses listed by the defense. The six accused will by then have spent between 11 and 14 years in preventive detention.


Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.