Bosnian Court President – happy with judicial reform

14 September 2011 by Nidzara Ahmetasevic

Judge Meddzida Kreso, President of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, says she is happy with the progress of judicial reform in the independent state, which is under international administration. Kreso was appointed by the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council as court president in 2004.

The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina was established in 2002 by the Office of the High Representative (OHR), which has the power to impose laws and sack politicians in the country since the end of the war in 1995. Primarily the Court was established in order to deal with the war crimes, but also with organised crime and corruption.

Judge Kreso said she feels her duty as a professional is to engage in the process of establishment of the rule of law after the war. Being president of the court is just a part of these efforts.

What is the hardest part of your job?
Besides being president, I also work as a judge on different cases. I am the head of the institution with 217 employees, including 55 judges – local and international.

I represent the Court but at the same time, cooperate with donors who support us. Indeed, every aspect of my work is important in its own way and any superficial approach could have a devastating impact. It is a hard job, but it is the job of any president of any state court.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.