All eyes on prosecution after Palestine ICC accession

13 January 2015 by Stephanie van den Berg

Speculation continues to mount over the next step of the office of the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) after, in the final hours of 2014, Palestine officially ratified the Rome Statute to become the 123rd member of the court.

ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda. Copyright Flickr/ICC-CPI
Image caption: 
ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda (Flickr/ICC-CPI)

The move, made possible after Palestine received a status upgrade at the UN to ‘non-member observer state’ in 2012, opens the possibility for Israeli and Palestinian citizens to be prosecuted by the Hague-based court for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed on Palestinian territory. Israel and the United States immediately condemned the development, calling it an “escalatory step” and stressing that negotiations were the only “realistic path” towards peace.

While, according to the Rome Statute, the ICC does not acquire jurisdiction until 60 days after a state accedes to the court – in this case, 1 April 2015 – Palestine has filed a request to give the court jurisdiction over prior events. It picked the date of 13 June 2014, thereby including the latest Gaza conflict.

Want to read more?

If you subscribe to a free membership, you can read this article and explore our full archive, dating back to 1997.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

article
11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

article
23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

article
United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

article
06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.